From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58748) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFWzD-00058I-23 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:48:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFWz7-0004fx-3J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:48:26 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]:45036) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFWz6-0004fs-TZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 17:48:21 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id w7so24784991qcr.28 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:48:20 -0800 (PST) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <53023917.6060702@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 10:30:15 -0600 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392574872-28725-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1392574872-28725-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] A64: finish Neon 3-reg-diff category, add LDTR/STTR List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , patches@linaro.org, Michael Matz , Alexander Graf , Claudio Fontana , Dirk Mueller , Will Newton , Laurent Desnogues , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alex_Benn=E9e?= , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, Christoffer Dall On 02/16/2014 12:21 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > Another patchset of random filling in the gaps in our Neon > coverage. Patches 1 through 5 complete our handling of the > three-reg-different category of Neon instructions. > > Patch 6 implements the "unprivileged load/store" LDTR/STTR > instructions. (In fact AArch64 Linux doesn't use these, and they're > pretty pointless in user mode, but they're easy enough to implement.) > > I haven't put in any of the fp_access_check() calls because > I'm assuming these will pass code review before the system > emulation patchset does; I'll update the latter to add the > extra checks as necessary at that point. > > thanks > -- PMM Aside from a nit in 5/6, Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson r~