From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFhgg-00075w-G9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:14:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFhgb-00012c-4S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:14:02 -0500 Message-ID: <53033261.7020100@suse.de> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:13:53 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392647854-8067-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <53025C08.2030207@redhat.com> <5302B11F.1070400@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: three easy patches for coverity-reported issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-stable , QEMU Developers , Patch Tracking Am 18.02.2014 10:46, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 18 February 2014 01:02, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote= : >> Shouldn't 1/3 and 3/3 be included in 1.7.1 as guest-triggerable bugs? >> There's no qemu-stable@nongnu.org in the commit message. >=20 > That's up to whoever maintains stable, I guess. I have no objection. No, we've had that topic before: It's your job as submitter and maintainer to flag that appropriately in the commit message, as per QEMU Summit 2012. Thanks, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg