From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54647) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFifZ-0007YW-QY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 06:17:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFifR-0004cH-RZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 06:16:57 -0500 Message-ID: <5303411A.5080601@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 12:16:42 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392647854-8067-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <53025C08.2030207@redhat.com> <5302B11F.1070400@suse.de> <53033261.7020100@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: three easy patches for coverity-reported issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYg==?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXI=?= Cc: qemu-stable , QEMU Developers , Patch Tracking Il 18/02/2014 12:09, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > > No, we've had that topic before: It's your job as submitter and > > maintainer to flag that appropriately in the commit message, as per QEMU > > Summit 2012. > > I don't think this workflow works. I have no idea what > stable's criteria are, and if you rely on people > adding a cc you're going to miss stuff. There isn't really a standard criterion. It's up to each maintainer to be stricter or looser on what goes to stable. Paolo