From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFkBZ-0004dg-Ci for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:54:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WFkBR-0000a1-P8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 07:54:05 -0500 Message-ID: <530357E2.9030708@suse.de> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:53:54 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392647854-8067-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <53025C08.2030207@redhat.com> <5302B11F.1070400@suse.de> <53033261.7020100@suse.de> <5303411A.5080601@redhat.com> <53034F6F.1010905@suse.de> <53035734.7050007@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <53035734.7050007@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] ARM: three easy patches for coverity-reported issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers , Paolo Bonzini , qemu-stable , Patch Tracking Am 18.02.2014 13:51, schrieb Alexander Graf: > Traditionally what I've done is to reply to patches > that I consider stable material and nag the maintainer about CCing it. > After a while people got so afraid of my emails that they started doing > the CC themselves :). But in case of the integrator board I personally > wouldn't bother ;). Well, I have been doing exactly that here, asking Peter to add the CC, and still Peter is refusing to add that single line before applying the patch to his branch... :( Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg