From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGoPw-0004pS-H3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:37:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGoPr-0003mS-Om for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:37:20 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WGoPr-0003mF-Fc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:37:15 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1LBbE0o015921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:37:15 -0500 Message-ID: <53073A66.5040906@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 12:37:10 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392644647-9897-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <20140219140616.GG3613@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> <53063B8F.9010307@redhat.com> <20140221110845.GB3346@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140221110845.GB3346@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/20] Improve bdrv_open error messages List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: jcody@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com Il 21/02/2014 12:08, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: > Am 20.02.2014 um 18:29 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> Il 19/02/2014 15:06, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: >>> Thanks, applied to the block branch. >> >> Conflicts with master... to help you rebasing I put my own version >> at block-open-errors on git://github.com/bonzini/qemu.git. > > Thanks, but rebasing is easier than removing patches, pulling and > revalidating that there were no other changes. I hope my rebase didn't > break anything - if it does, complain to Markus. All fine. The idea was more to let you do a double check with diff \ <(git log -p --reverse kwolf/block~20..kwolf/block) \ <(git log -p --reverse bonzini/block-open-errors~20..bonzini/block-open-errors) Paolo