qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:00:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5307BE7A.5050007@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530764B0.40500@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2047 bytes --]

On 02/21/2014 07:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I have no objection to introducing a QMP command.
>>
>> I think qom-find-objects-by-class is a reasonable approach but I would
>> also consider just grouping all of the IOThreads in a well known path
>> instead of just having them live in /objects.  So something like
>> /objects/threads/thread0/pid.
> 
> /objects is the namespace for -object, but a similar idea is that
> objects could create links of themselves under other paths.  So you
> would have /threads where you can list iothread objects or /backend/rng
> for RNG backends.
> 
> Still Stefan doesn't like the idea of sending O(n) commands to query the
> thread ID of n iothread objects.

The other burden is documenting what QOM paths to be queried, and
knowing where to find that documentation.  That is, it's another layer
of complexity, but it's also a more powerful expression.

I'm comparing this situation somewhat to libvirt's 'virsh
qemu-monitor-command' vs. other libvirt commands.  qemu-monitor-command
is a more powerful interface (via libvirt, you can issue ANY qmp
command), and is therefore great for development for testing something
that libvirt has not yet supported; but not so nice to the end user
(it's use is explicitly unsupported).  What happens is that as people
say "I had to use qemu-monitor-command to do task A", it is a hint to
libvirt development to say "oh, we need to add an API to make task A
easier to do".

Thus, having qom-find-objects-by-class is a good idea, even if it is
more awkward to use than a dedicated qmp command.  But meanwhile, we
should watch what common patterns it gets used for, and add dedicated
QMP commands for those patterns.  It's much faster to get a chunk of
information in one QMP call already formatted into desired structs than
it is to make a series of QMP calls to learn about the lower-level qom
model one piece at a time.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 604 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-21 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-21  9:16 [Qemu-devel] QOM vs QAPI for QMP APIs Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-21 14:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2014-02-21 14:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-21 21:00     ` Eric Blake [this message]
2014-02-24  8:29       ` Markus Armbruster
2014-02-24 16:08         ` Eric Blake
2014-02-25  8:25           ` Markus Armbruster
2014-02-25  8:30             ` Andreas Färber
2014-02-25  8:30             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-25  8:33               ` Andreas Färber
2014-02-21 14:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-25  9:46   ` Kevin Wolf
2014-02-25 10:15     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-02-25 10:47       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-25 13:39         ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5307BE7A.5050007@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).