From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
linaro-dev <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org"
<linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Wook Wookey <wookey@linaro.org>,
Christoffer Dall <Christoffer.Dall@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:49:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530C5925.8060608@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87txbnfuw1.fsf@linaro.org>
Am 25.02.2014 09:39, schrieb Alex Bennée:
>
> Dann Frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:40 AM, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks to all involved for your work here!
>>
>>> After a solid few months of work the QEMU master branch [1] has now reached
>>> instruction feature parity with the suse-1.6 [6] tree that a lot of people
>>> have been using to build various aarch64 binaries. In addition to the
> <snip>
>>>
>>> I've tested against the following aarch64 rootfs:
>>> * SUSE [2]
>>> * Debian [3]
>>> * Ubuntu Saucy [4]
>>
>> fyi, I've been doing my testing with Ubuntu Trusty.
>
> Good stuff, I shall see if I can set one up. Is the package coverage
> between trusty and saucy much different? I noticed for example I
> couldn't find zile and various build-deps for llvm.
>
> <snip>
>>>
>>> Feedback I'm interested in
>>> ==========================
>>>
>>> * Any instruction failure (please include the log line with the
>>> unsupported message)
>>> * Any aarch64 specific failures (i.e. not generic QEMU threading flakeiness).
>>
>> I'm not sure if this qualifies as generic QEMU threading flakiness or not. I've
>> found a couple conditions that causes master to core dump fairly
>> reliably, while the aarch64-1.6 branch seems to consistently work
>> fine.
>>
>> 1) dh_fixperms is a script that commonly runs at the end of a package build.
>> Its basically doing a `find | xargs chmod`.
>> 2) debootstrap --second-stage
>> This is used to configure an arm64 chroot that was built using
>> debootstrap on a non-native host. It is basically invoking a bunch of
>> shell scripts (postinst, etc). When it blows up, the stack consistently
>> looks like this:
>>
>> Core was generated by `/usr/bin/qemu-aarch64-static /bin/sh -e
>> /debootstrap/debootstrap --second-stage'.
>> Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> #0 0x0000000060058e55 in memcpy (__len=8, __src=0x7fff62ae34e0,
>> __dest=0x400082c330) at
>> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:51
>> 51 return __builtin___memcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len, __bos0 (__dest));
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x0000000060058e55 in memcpy (__len=8, __src=0x7fff62ae34e0,
>> __dest=0x400082c330) at
>> /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string3.h:51
>> #1 stq_p (v=274886476624, ptr=0x400082c330) at
>> /mnt/qemu.upstream/include/qemu/bswap.h:280
>> #2 stq_le_p (v=274886476624, ptr=0x400082c330) at
>> /mnt/qemu.upstream/include/qemu/bswap.h:315
>> #3 target_setup_sigframe (set=0x7fff62ae3530, env=0x62d9c678,
>> sf=0x400082b0d0) at /mnt/qemu.upstream/linux-user/signal.c:1167
>> #4 target_setup_frame (usig=usig@entry=17, ka=ka@entry=0x604ec1e0
>> <sigact_table+512>, info=info@entry=0x0, set=set@entry=0x7fff62ae3530,
>> env=env@entry=0x62d9c678)
>> at /mnt/qemu.upstream/linux-user/signal.c:1286
>> #5 0x0000000060059f46 in setup_frame (env=0x62d9c678,
>> set=0x7fff62ae3530, ka=0x604ec1e0 <sigact_table+512>, sig=17) at
>> /mnt/qemu.upstream/linux-user/signal.c:1322
>> #6 process_pending_signals (cpu_env=cpu_env@entry=0x62d9c678) at
>> /mnt/qemu.upstream/linux-user/signal.c:5747
>> #7 0x0000000060056e60 in cpu_loop (env=env@entry=0x62d9c678) at
>> /mnt/qemu.upstream/linux-user/main.c:1082
>> #8 0x0000000060005079 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized
>> out>, envp=<optimized out>) at
>> /mnt/qemu.upstream/linux-user/main.c:4374
>>
>> There are some pretty large differences between these trees with
>> respect to signal syscalls - is that the likely culprit?
>
> Quite likely. We explicitly concentrated on the arch64 specific
> instruction emulation leaving more generic patches to flow in from SUSE
> as they matured.
>
> I guess it's time to go through the remaining patches and see what's up-streamable.
>
> Alex/Michael,
>
> Are any of these patches in flight now?
I don't think so, Alex seems to hate cleaning that stuff up... :P
Compare https://github.com/openSUSE/qemu/commits/opensuse-1.7 for our
general queue. We have patches adding locking to TCG, and there's a hack
pinning the CPU somewhere.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-25 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 13:40 [Qemu-devel] Call for testing QEMU aarch64-linux-user emulation Alex Bennée
2014-02-24 13:01 ` Janne Grunau
2014-02-25 15:54 ` Alex Bennée
2014-02-25 17:11 ` Janne Grunau
2014-03-06 11:40 ` Alex Bennée
2014-03-06 16:04 ` Janne Grunau
2014-02-24 20:58 ` Dann Frazier
2014-02-25 8:39 ` Alex Bennée
2014-02-25 8:49 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-02-25 13:33 ` Michael Matz
2014-02-25 13:46 ` Peter Maydell
2014-02-25 14:56 ` Michael Matz
2014-02-28 14:12 ` Alex Bennée
2014-02-28 14:21 ` Peter Maydell
2014-02-28 14:27 ` Alexander Graf
2014-02-28 14:49 ` Peter Maydell
2014-02-28 17:08 ` Alex Bennée
2014-02-28 17:17 ` Peter Maydell
2014-02-26 22:06 ` Dann Frazier
2014-02-27 13:20 ` Michael Matz
2014-02-27 19:47 ` Dann Frazier
2014-03-14 14:20 ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-09 23:37 ` Dann Frazier
2014-03-09 23:51 ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-10 11:28 ` Alex Bennée
2014-03-10 11:45 ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-10 13:56 ` Michael Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530C5925.8060608@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=Christoffer.Dall@linaro.org \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=matz@suse.de \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wookey@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).