From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIfeO-0004WT-28 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIfeI-0006hd-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:39:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WIfeH-0006gh-Po for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 09:39:49 -0500 Message-ID: <530DFCAC.1090407@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:39:40 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <53047351.80300@redhat.com> <20140219103657.4daed264@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <20140226055706.GA5090@G08FNSTD100614.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> <20140226101056.1a9ec3b3@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <530DC2FA.9080401@redhat.com> <20140226133119.3ccca5a3@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <530DE1F2.6060701@redhat.com> <20140226144333.5ed8e07e@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <530DF070.7020803@redhat.com> <20140226152524.4fee536f@nial.usersys.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140226152524.4fee536f@nial.usersys.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v18 13/14] memory backend: fill memory backend ram fields List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Igor Mammedov Cc: Hu Tao , Marcelo Tosatti , lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wanlong Gao Il 26/02/2014 15:25, Igor Mammedov ha scritto: > 1: 'realize' approach I suggested > drawback is: assumption that all backends derived from HostMemoryBackend > will inherit NUMA controls even if backend shouldn't have > one (for example: fictional remote memory backend) > plus: derived types from HostMemoryBackend, don't need to know anything > about NUMA. Let's go with this for now. It keeps things simple. Paolo