From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJP0h-00024v-OK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:06:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJP0b-0008FF-Nb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 10:05:59 -0500 Message-ID: <5310A5BF.6030003@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 16:05:35 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1392904246-15575-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1392904246-15575-4-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <530609F9.1060105@redhat.com> <530F14C2.2050808@suse.de> <530F1670.2070701@redhat.com> <1393511950.31381.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <530F52C5.3080209@redhat.com> <1393513484.31381.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5310A55B.7030602@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <5310A55B.7030602@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 3/6] vl: allow customizing the class of /machine List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , Marcel Apfelbaum Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmU=?= =?UTF-8?B?YXMgRsOkcmJlcg==?= Il 28/02/2014 16:03, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: > On 02/28/2014 02:04 AM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: >> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 15:59 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Il 27/02/2014 15:39, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: >>>>>> >>>>>> Each of them highlights one of the two aspects that, in my opinion, make >>>>>> QOM interesting (respectively, unification of interfaces and the >>>>>> containment tree). >>>> I was planning to tackle the replacement of the machine from a container >>>> to an actual object too, however this patch conflicts with my >>>> series because I already have a QOM Machine object created *always* >>>> and this patch adds another object *sometimes*. >>>> >>>> Is this patch's functionality in use yet? Any idea how to merge those ideas? >>> >>> pseries simply wants to make /machine implement the FWPathProvider >>> interface. As long as you have a way for boards to specify a TypeInfo >>> for /machine, this patch will not get in the way. >> Thanks Paolo! I'll be aware not to brake this functionality. >> Marcel > > What is the outcome of this discussion for the patches I posted? Do I have > to wait till you finish that machine properties rework and repost or...? Your patches are fine. Who gets in first, wins. The other, rebases. :) Paolo