From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Hoyer, David" <David.Hoyer@netapp.com>,
"Qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <Qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: "Moyer, Keith" <Keith.Moyer@netapp.com>,
"Best, Tish" <Tish.Best@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] e1000 memory corruption in guest OS
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:47:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53145DD4.4040101@ozlabs.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53143E50.5060205@redhat.com>
On 03/03/2014 07:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/03/2014 02:58, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> On 03/02/2014 08:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 01/03/2014 13:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Corrupted DMA buffer is 0x e00000 -- 0x7f15c313f000.
>>>>>> The e1000 packet is at 0x12ffac2 -- 0x7f15c313eac2.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (0x7f15c313f000 - 0x7f15c313eac2) = 0x53e which is less than 0x5aa and
>>>>>> (0x5aa - 0x53e) = 0x6c bytes get corrupted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see here buffer overrun from e1000 and I suspect that your patch just
>>>>>> hides this problem. What did I miss?
>>>>
>>>> Ping, anyone?
>>>
>>> You missed that this is a Xen-specific problem. Xen maps things a page at
>>> a time, so address_space_map/unmap/rw can operate only on a small part of
>>> the requested [address, address+length) range.
>>
>> Sorry, I am not following you here. Does KVM map things not page-aligned?
>
> Look in exec.c for xen_enabled(). Xen's implementation of
> address_space_map/unmap is completely different.
Honestly cannot see much difference in the current QEMU...
>
>>> So there is no overrun in e1000. The patch is incomplete, because it fixes
>>> only address_space_rw, but the problem is indeed in exec.c.
>>
>> So you know what the problem is? We have a bunch of bugreports against
>> e1000 breaking things...
>
> This one had been reported and fixed already.
Any hint? :) Could not spot any related to overrun except:
a0ae17a 8 months ago Andrew Jones e1000: cleanup process_tx_desc
but commit message says "complaints are false positives"...
--
Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-16 4:29 [Qemu-devel] e1000 memory corruption in guest OS Hoyer, David
2014-02-24 4:20 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-03-01 12:30 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-03-01 21:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-03 1:58 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-03-03 8:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-03 10:47 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy [this message]
2014-03-03 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-03 21:33 ` Don Slutz
2014-03-03 22:53 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2014-02-24 14:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-02-24 14:15 ` Hoyer, David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53145DD4.4040101@ozlabs.ru \
--to=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=David.Hoyer@netapp.com \
--cc=Keith.Moyer@netapp.com \
--cc=Qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=Tish.Best@netapp.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).