From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKSHn-0005Hc-1m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:48:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKSHe-0000hU-K4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:47:58 -0500 Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]:35986) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WKSHe-0000hO-FW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:47:50 -0500 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id i17so701750qcy.28 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 04:47:50 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <531479EF.30104@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:47:43 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1393765632-2753-1-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> <1393765632-2753-7-git-send-email-marcel.a@redhat.com> <53145568.50108@redhat.com> <1393848578.3882.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1393848578.3882.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC V2 6/9] vl.c: do not set 'type' property in obj_set_property List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcel Apfelbaum Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, armbru@redhat.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, quintela@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, aliguori@amazon.com, edgar.iglesias@gmail.com, scottwood@freescale.com, imammedo@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, rth@twiddle.net Il 03/03/2014 13:09, Marcel Apfelbaum ha scritto: >> > Unfortunately, it is quite possible to have a -object invocation where >> > the object has a "type" property. > Thanks, I was thinking that "type" is a built-in property of the Object, > derived directly from class's type, so no one can "set" this property. Actually you're right. Perhaps we can make -object take "type" instead of "qom-type" too. Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini Paolo