From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v10 0/2] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:50:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5314B2CA.3020708@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393313787-890-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de>
Am 25.02.2014 08:36, schrieb Andreas Färber:
> Hello,
>
> Here's my cleaned up version of slim x86 CPU subclasses.
> Second patch didn't get a lot of testing yet.
>
> Loading cpudef is still in main initfn since otherwise the host type
> would need to be relocated. Can be cleaned up as follow-ups.
>
> I wonder whether we are intentionally registering the host type even for
> !CONFIG_KVM? Instantiating it will then always lead to assertion failure.
Ping! Did anyone review or test? Still applies after new x2apic patches.
Andreas
> Available for testing here:
> git://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu.git qom-cpu-x86-subclasses.v10
> https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-cpu-x86-subclasses.v10
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> v9 -> v10:
> * Cleaned up documentation comments.
> * Prepended patch to implement CPUClass::class_by_name(), rebased on it.
> * Cleaned up naming (..._class_init, ..._initfn, type vs. class).
> * Dropped duplicate white line.
> * Dropped unnecessary .abstract, .instance_size, .class_size fields.
> * Aligned model type registration with other targets by having the
> registration function operate on one model only.
> * Relocated cpudef-based types to after x86_cpu_load_cpudef().
> * Moved assignment of cpu_def into cpudef-specific class_init.
>
> (went through various hands, last ehabkost's)
>
> v2 -> v3:
> * Instead of re-coding all CPU definitions as class_init functions, leave
> the built-in definition array in place and place x86_def_t in the class.
> * Use kvm_arch_init() hook to assure class_init succeeds for -cpu host.
> Suggested by Eduardo.
>
> v1-> v2:
> * Instead of turning x86_def_t into X86CPUInfo to initialize classes,
> drop it completely and register types manually with customizable TypeInfos
> * Use new list facilities for printing -cpu ? models
> * Adopt new name scheme suggested by Eduardo and ideas from my alpha series
> * Keep short names in -cpu ? output for alignment reasons
> * Merge cpu_x86_init() into cpu.c:cpu_x86_register()
> * Append patch showing Haswell as subclass of SandyBridge
>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
>
> Andreas Färber (1):
> target-i386: Prepare CPUClass::class_by_name for X86CPU
>
> Eduardo Habkost (1):
> target-i386: X86CPU model subclasses
>
> target-i386/cpu-qom.h | 15 ++++
> target-i386/cpu.c | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-25 7:36 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v10 0/2] target-i386: X86CPU subclasses Andreas Färber
2014-02-25 7:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v10 1/2] target-i386: Prepare CPUClass::class_by_name for X86CPU Andreas Färber
2014-03-04 19:48 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-02-25 7:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v10 2/2] target-i386: X86CPU model subclasses Andreas Färber
2014-03-04 19:53 ` Eduardo Habkost
2014-03-09 15:49 ` Andreas Färber
2014-03-03 16:50 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5314B2CA.3020708@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).