qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Benoît Canet" <benoit.canet@irqsave.net>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Benoit Canet <benoit@irqsave.net>,
	stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Rewrite the snapshot authorization mechanism for block filters.
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 19:35:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5314CB61.7090401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393870294-19351-2-git-send-email-benoit.canet@irqsave.net>

Il 03/03/2014 19:11, Benoît Canet ha scritto:
> diff --git a/block/blkverify.c b/block/blkverify.c
> index b98b08b..e1c3117 100644
> --- a/block/blkverify.c
> +++ b/block/blkverify.c
> @@ -288,6 +288,20 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB *blkverify_aio_flush(BlockDriverState *bs,
>      return bdrv_aio_flush(s->test_file, cb, opaque);
>  }
>
> +static bool blkverify_recurse_is_first_non_filter(BlockDriverState *bs,
> +                                                  BlockDriverState *candidate)
> +{
> +    BDRVBlkverifyState *s = bs->opaque;
> +
> +    bool perm = bdrv_recurse_is_first_non_filter(bs->file, candidate);
> +
> +    if (perm) {
> +        return true;
> +    }
> +
> +    return bdrv_recurse_is_first_non_filter(s->test_file, candidate);

Thanks!  Is this a silent bugfix? :)

It is a behavior change from before, because BS_FILTER_PASS_DOWN only 
tested bs->file.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-03 18:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-03 18:11 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Rewrite block filter snapshot authorization mechanism Benoît Canet
2014-03-03 18:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: Rewrite the snapshot authorization mechanism for block filters Benoît Canet
2014-03-03 18:35   ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-03-03 19:13     ` Benoît Canet
2014-03-03 21:26       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-10 18:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Rewrite block filter snapshot authorization mechanism Benoît Canet
2014-03-11 18:19 ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5314CB61.7090401@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=benoit.canet@irqsave.net \
    --cc=benoit@irqsave.net \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).