From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33214)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WLGtP-00073r-T3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:50:17 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WLGtK-0004iX-3S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:50:11 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:58312 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WLGtJ-0004ha-Tv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 13:50:06 -0500
Message-ID: <531771DC.2000505@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 19:50:04 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1392158763-6552-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org>	<5314FC9D.5040203@reactos.org>
	<20140304234922.GA22576@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140304234922.GA22576@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] PC: improve emulation correctness
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Herv=E9_Pouss?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ineau?= <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>

Am 05.03.2014 00:49, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:05:17PM +0100, Herv=E9 Poussineau wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> QEMU crash at reboot is due to not resetting PAM registers at i440fx
>> reset, but a patch has already been rejected on ML:
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-02/msg02928.html
>>
>> Herv=E9
>=20
> I thought an alternative fix is being worked on?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-02/msg02967.html

And I was told an alternative fix had been applied - was I misinformed?

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg