From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WMv0t-00039A-LX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 03:52:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WMv0l-0006fw-86 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 03:52:43 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <531D6F37.2050700@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 08:52:23 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1394410549-13751-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1394410549-13751-10-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1394410549-13751-10-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v2 09/40] cpu: Turn cpu_handle_mmu_fault() into a CPUClass hook List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell , Jia Liu , Anthony Green , Alexander Graf , Blue Swirl , Michael Walle , PowerPC , "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Guan Xuetao , Aurelien Jarno , Richard Henderson Il 10/03/2014 01:15, Andreas Färber ha scritto: > Note that while such functions may exist both for *-user and softmmu, > only *-user uses the CPUState hook, while softmmu reuses the prototype > for calling it directly. I'm not sure I understand why you omit the hook for *-softmmu. It doesn't hurt to have it, does it? Paolo