From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35977)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WN2g5-0003c6-H2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:03:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WN2fx-0006co-39
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:03:45 -0400
Received: from mail-qc0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::231]:63680)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WN2fw-0006ci-VW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:03:37 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w7so7831982qcr.22
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <531DE252.60206@twiddle.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:03:30 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1394043081-4668-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<531CE961.1080108@ilande.co.uk>
	<CACXAS8AYxk9QEK7o8PvRG38w3nT0zq_Mcm-pwH28PKKDPg_4_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<531D83A5.1030203@ilande.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <531D83A5.1030203@ilande.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] tcg-sparc updates
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 03/10/2014 02:19 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 10/03/14 09:06, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> 
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I think a better test case would be looking for regressions in
>> x86/x86-64 images. I'd suspect someone would launch QEMU on a SPARC
>> machine to emulate some other platform. (Solaris containers would be
>> more efficient for running SPARC on SPARC)
>>
>> Artyom
> 
> Oh so this is for host code generation rather than target? In that case I don't
> have any suitable hardware to test :/

Yes, this is for sparc host.


r~