From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37772)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <James.Hogan@imgtec.com>) id 1WOOeB-0002Br-4q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:43:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <James.Hogan@imgtec.com>) id 1WOOe6-00040D-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:43:22 -0400
Received: from mailapp01.imgtec.com ([195.89.28.114]:60079)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <James.Hogan@imgtec.com>) id 1WOOe5-0003zC-W7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:43:18 -0400
Message-ID: <5322CF34.2020002@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:43:16 +0000
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1394125778-18746-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
	<1394125778-18746-7-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
	<53222304.3050902@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA8_PL3e2ckqFa4KBxNT-R2mK5cKCEOpod3cx0cYX6PGXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8_PL3e2ckqFa4KBxNT-R2mK5cKCEOpod3cx0cYX6PGXA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/9] target-mips: kvm: Add main KVM
 support for MIPS
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Sanjay Lal <sanjayl@kymasys.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

On 13/03/14 22:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 March 2014 21:28, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> I'm not sure if we have a policy about __u64 etc. in KVM code. Since
>> it'll be Linux-only I don't see problems currently; for cross-platform
>> parts we prefer uint64_t. Suggest to leave as is unless told otherwise=
.
>=20
> For ARM I took the view that __u64 were the kernel's types, not
> ours. The kernel header structs define fields as __u64 but for
> in-QEMU functions and variables we should use the posix uint64_t.

Thanks, I'll follow that way then.

Cheers
James