From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56925)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WORcx-00068V-Pz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:54:25 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WORcr-0007lU-R4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:54:19 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15922)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WORcr-0007lN-J8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 08:54:13 -0400
Message-ID: <5322FBD0.1000206@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 13:53:36 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1394125778-18746-1-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
	<1394125778-18746-7-git-send-email-james.hogan@imgtec.com>
	<53222304.3050902@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA8_PL3e2ckqFa4KBxNT-R2mK5cKCEOpod3cx0cYX6PGXA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8_PL3e2ckqFa4KBxNT-R2mK5cKCEOpod3cx0cYX6PGXA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/9] target-mips: kvm: Add main KVM
 support for MIPS
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYg==?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXI=?= <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Sanjay Lal <sanjayl@kymasys.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

Il 13/03/2014 23:35, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> > I'm not sure if we have a policy about __u64 etc. in KVM code. Since
>> > it'll be Linux-only I don't see problems currently; for cross-platform
>> > parts we prefer uint64_t. Suggest to leave as is unless told otherwise.
> For ARM I took the view that __u64 were the kernel's types, not
> ours. The kernel header structs define fields as __u64 but for
> in-QEMU functions and variables we should use the posix uint64_t.

Agree.

Paolo