qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.a@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] small memory leak due to MachineClass rework
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 22:38:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53276B64.4040208@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5327691D.3040906@de.ibm.com>

Am 17.03.2014 22:29, schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
> On 17/03/14 22:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 March 2014 20:56, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> Turns out that valgrind is right. We simply forget the memory that g_strconcat has allocated.
>>> This fixes the small leak, but I have to cast away the constness of .name.
>>> Any better ideas?
>>
>> It's how cpu_register() in target-arm/cpu.c does the same thing
>> (though we use void* rather than gpointer as the cast).
> 
> Ok, if you dont have a problem with that approach, I can submit a proper
> patch with signoff.  Any preference regarding void * vs gpointer?

void *. We try to avoid g* types where possible/sensible.

Thanks for catching this!

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-17 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-17 20:56 [Qemu-devel] small memory leak due to MachineClass rework Christian Borntraeger
2014-03-17 21:25 ` Peter Maydell
2014-03-17 21:29   ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-03-17 21:38     ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-03-17 21:43     ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2014-03-18 14:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53276B64.4040208@suse.de \
    --to=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).