qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	afaerber@suse.de, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0?] target-i386: fix gdb debugging with large memory guests
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:36:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <532859FD.4090907@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140318090043.3eba6b1a@redhat.com>

On 2014-03-18 14:00, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014 11:30:42 +0100
> Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2014-03-18 08:36, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 18/03/2014 08:19, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>>>> On 2014-03-18 02:54, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>>> If you start a Linux guest with more than 4GB of memory and try to
>>>>> look at a
>>>>> memory address, you will get an error from gdb:
>>>>>
>>>>> (gdb) p node_data[0]->node_id
>>>>> Cannot access memory at address 0xffff88013fffd3a0
>>>>> (gdb)
>>>>
>>>> I suppose this is x86-64, not 32-bit with PTE, right?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I debugged this down to x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(), it doesn't
>>>>> handle the
>>>>> case where the PDPTE has the PS bit set (although I didn't check
>>>>> where Linux
>>>>> sets that bit). This commit adds the PS bit handling, which fixes the
>>>>> problem
>>>>> for me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Luiz capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> Two observations:
>>>>>
>>>>>  1. This bug has always existed, so it's not a regression, so I'm not
>>>>> sure
>>>>>     it's worth it to fix for 2.0
>>>
>>> Sure, why not?
>>>
>>>>>  2. I'm not familiar with every detail of x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(),
>>>>>     so I'm not completely sure this is the right thing to do
>>>>>
>>>>>  target-i386/helper.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
>>>>> index 4f447b8..9b7803f 100644
>>>>> --- a/target-i386/helper.c
>>>>> +++ b/target-i386/helper.c
>>>>> @@ -951,6 +951,13 @@ hwaddr x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug(CPUState *cs,
>>>>> vaddr addr)
>>>>>                  return -1;
>>>>>          }
>>>>>
>>>>> +        if (pdpe & PG_PSE_MASK) {
>>>>> +            page_size = 1024 * 1024 * 1024;
>>>>> +            pte = pdpe & ~( (page_size - 1) & ~0xfff);
>>>>> +            pte &= ~(PG_NX_MASK | PG_HI_USER_MASK);
>>>>> +            goto out;
>>>>> +        }
>>>>
>>>> Does this also apply if we are not in long mode?
>>>
>>> No, it doesn't.  The only valid bits in a PAE PDPTE are P, PWT and PCD.
>>>  Bit 7 (PS) is reserved.
>>
>> Right, this belongs in the "if (env->hflags & HF_LMA_MASK)" block.
>>
>> And the subject or description should mention that
>> x86_cpu_get_phys_page_debug was lacking support for 1G hugepages.
> 
> To be honest, although the PS bit is set and that indicates a 1GB page,
> I didn't know Linux does that. I thought Linux would use 4KB pages for
> everything unless it's explicitly asked to use bigger pages. Also, note that
> I was using gdb to debug really early kernel boot code (start_kernel()).

I could imagine that Linux initially creates a giant identity mapping
page table for the startup process and only later on switches to
fine-grained tables of 4K and 2M pages. Giant pages still require
hughtlbfs, IIRC.

> 
> I'd feel more confident to have such a changelog after I find out where
> exactly Linux sets that bit, but I won't have time in the next days. On the
> other hand, the patch does fix the problem to me.

Don't worry about Linux (the code should work with any OS anyway), just
believe your reviewers. ;) Alternatively, check Intel IA32 SDM on page
table structures.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-18 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-03-18  1:54 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0?] target-i386: fix gdb debugging with large memory guests Luiz Capitulino
2014-03-18  7:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2014-03-18  7:36   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-18 10:30     ` Jan Kiszka
2014-03-18 13:00       ` Luiz Capitulino
2014-03-18 14:36         ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2014-03-18 16:23           ` Luiz Capitulino
2014-03-18 16:37             ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-03-18 16:45               ` Jan Kiszka
2014-03-18 12:49   ` Luiz Capitulino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=532859FD.4090907@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).