From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49956)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WPwXV-0008Iq-Jf
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:07:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WPwXM-0004Ed-L8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:06:53 -0400
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]:62743)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WPwXM-0004EV-Gi
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:06:44 -0400
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id w7so1610659qcr.11
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53286F0F.6020909@twiddle.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:06:39 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1395157702-23108-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<1395157702-23108-2-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net>
	<CAFEAcA-ynpc5g_OoGsXJ7n7dunx3tTBhMrAuPZ-1ANOQTJjCdA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-ynpc5g_OoGsXJ7n7dunx3tTBhMrAuPZ-1ANOQTJjCdA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] tcg: Mask shift quantities while
	folding
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 03/18/2014 08:59 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Don't you also need to do something similar for the
> "calculate known-zeroes bits" code on lines 807..833 ?

Yep.


r~