From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQcCh-0004xp-1K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:36:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQcCb-0000bn-4s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:36:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::22f]:36500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WQcCa-0000bX-U0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:36:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id b15so610916eek.34 for ; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <532AE0B0.8000103@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 13:36:00 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5320ADCF.5000406@weilnetz.de> <5320B85B.4030202@twiddle.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Raspbian in QEMU List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , Richard Henderson Cc: Stefan Weil , Peter Hanzel , QEMU Developers Il 12/03/2014 21:01, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > On 12 March 2014 19:41, Richard Henderson wrote: >> Ew. No. It would be easier to just implement setend, even if badly. > > Agreed. > >> For my part, the endian-aware load/store opcodes I alluded to last >> August are now in. > > Yes, it would be fairly straightforward to implement setend now. > I haven't actually looked at it, though, because the only thing that > uses it is this raspi memcmp code, and there's a workaround > for that. So other things have been higher priority. I looked at that yesterday and it took me exactly one hour... I'll submit it for 2.1 since I'm interested (for non-work reasons) in Raspberry Pi emulation. Paolo