From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51368)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <revol@free.fr>) id 1WQcih-0002b5-0L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:09:16 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <revol@free.fr>) id 1WQcif-0003IJ-U0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:09:14 -0400
Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr ([2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]:53134)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <revol@free.fr>) id 1WQcif-0003Hc-9A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:09:13 -0400
Message-ID: <532AE86A.6010503@free.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 14:08:58 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois_Revol?= <revol@free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD=tUvzW7T9qhgj9O=UJtFp6G-5ALc0+2G8g_iqaP5w4Ub-k7A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFEAcA9ScLuGNx2mYMgQCsz3kJroD9subgvxt33dceZkSXn=+A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAD=tUvyP=UPZ2tS9L_9g6cz7veKe_xmT+q53ac9N_fU67bpnBQ@mail.gmail.com>	<5320ADCF.5000406@weilnetz.de>
	<5320B85B.4030202@twiddle.net>
	<CAFEAcA_TmJy2RToxPmurBe6LXVQaKfC7kX4_bSNzqaRQXqK39A@mail.gmail.com>
	<532AE0B0.8000103@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <532AE0B0.8000103@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Raspbian in QEMU
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, Peter Hanzel <hanzelpeter@gmail.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

On 20/03/2014 13:36, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 12/03/2014 21:01, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> On 12 March 2014 19:41, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
>>> Ew.  No.  It would be easier to just implement setend, even if badly.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>>> For my part, the endian-aware load/store opcodes I alluded to last
>>> August are now in.
>>
>> Yes, it would be fairly straightforward to implement setend now.
>> I haven't actually looked at it, though, because the only thing that
>> uses it is this raspi memcmp code, and there's a workaround
>> for that. So other things have been higher priority.
>=20
> I looked at that yesterday and it took me exactly one hour... I'll
> submit it for 2.1 since I'm interested (for non-work reasons) in
> Raspberry Pi emulation.

Just so you don't start rewriting the wheel:

https://github.com/Torlus/qemu/tree/rpi

I'm not sure how far he went yet though.

Fran=E7ois.