From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WT0yA-000478-NZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:27:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WT0y6-00072e-CP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:27:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WT0y6-00072U-3z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:27:02 -0400 Message-ID: <53339A69.50809@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:26:33 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1395890303-7880-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <1395890303-7880-2-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1395890303-7880-2-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HjnJ4SCDdmiAgiHAkuPDBxEROEKQim8oM" Subject: [Qemu-devel] for 2.0? Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] XBZRLE: Fix one XBZRLE corruption issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: arei.gonglei@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: ChenLiang , weidong.huang@huawei.com, quintela@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, owasserm@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --HjnJ4SCDdmiAgiHAkuPDBxEROEKQim8oM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/26/2014 09:18 PM, arei.gonglei@huawei.com wrote: > From: ChenLiang >=20 > The page may not be inserted into cache after executing save_xbzrle_pag= e. > In case of failure to insert, the original page should be sent rather > than the page in the cache. >=20 > Signed-off-by: ChenLiang > Signed-off-by: Gonglei > Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela > --- > arch_init.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) Should this patch be included in 2.0 as a bug fix? The rest of the series is probably better off in 2.1. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --HjnJ4SCDdmiAgiHAkuPDBxEROEKQim8oM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTM5ppAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqdiYH/0lht8I4wI4B7np13JUaYZCi /vsemg360bsKQvJgrCjUo5CuC2kA7Ey0zH4qn6zZn1aInyd9z8hHHQXQWPIGmhrH oyAnluxUm+Go1e7TwVd33PYy9WjLHP5bOl9olQizHJjaVepMc2G5ilTtrqHOeGpN BkMfxS+EE9C9trXbjN6vi+H+oUckFyy6O4moYtZtRAWaP7q1RhfRHAmIhdVZuI7Z ishRwG7AQrn2vn5Ru/yvc9kb9WN0JKykERJtKaRQqnBp/g41EqTtE2iNkvQxHsCM RRy5bWChbVfcYT1wQm2GE33ygf/beCOMQ6mT1P/sWXMW4oe/ogSiw8az/dyntT0= =WfNM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HjnJ4SCDdmiAgiHAkuPDBxEROEKQim8oM--