From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTAQT-0004Ac-MY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:33:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTAQN-0001hL-Nr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:32:57 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WTAQN-0001hA-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 09:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: <53341A06.8010704@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 13:31:02 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1395890303-7880-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <1395890303-7880-2-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <53339A69.50809@redhat.com> <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF19020815DB55A@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF19020815DB55A@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] for 2.0? Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] XBZRLE: Fix one XBZRLE corruption issues List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Gonglei (Arei)" , Eric Blake , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: "owasserm@redhat.com" , "chenliang (T)" , "Huangweidong (C)" , "dgilbert@redhat.com" , "quintela@redhat.com" Il 27/03/2014 04:45, Gonglei (Arei) ha scritto: >>> arch_init.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >> >> Should this patch be included in 2.0 as a bug fix? The rest of the >> series is probably better off in 2.1. >> > Yes, it should be, but I am not so clear how to do it. > Eric, Could you give me some advices? Thank you so much. David and Juan will sort that out. :) Paolo