From: Tom Musta <tommusta@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" <qemu-ppc@nongnu.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] target-ppc: Problem with mtmsr emulation
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 09:36:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533588FC.70807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140328130233.2b6e8a3e@oc7435384737.ibm.com>
On 3/28/2014 7:02 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 18:25:02 +0800
> Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Am 28.03.2014 um 16:16 schrieb Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
>>>
<snip>
>>> An easy way to fix this for Book III-S is to change the mask to
>>> 0x001EF801 (just like the mask for mtmsrd), but I am afraid that this
>>> would break the Book III-E variant of mtmsr, since the embedded version
>>> does not have this bit defined. Any suggestions how to fix this problem
>>> in a proper way?
>>
>> Please check in the older isa versions whether that bit is declared reserved.
>>
>> If it is, we need to make sure we only match it on newer ISA conformance.
>
> The oldest ISA version that I've found (version 2.01, from 2003) already
> contains the L bit, so I assume it's always been there. So it's likely
> just a Book III-S vs. Book III-E issue.
>
The L bit was not part of the original PowerPC ISA. I checked both my 604 manual
((C) 1993) and the May, Silha, Simpson, Warren book ((C) 1994) ... neither contains
the L bit. So the *actual* delineation is not as simple as Book III-S vs. Book
III-E. I suspect the change was introduced in the mid-2000's.
To make matters worse, the change was incompatible with the previous versions of
the architecture -- The L=1 case is the old behavior (copy source register bits
verbatim, execution synchronizing) whereas L=0 is the new behavior (force external
interrupts and virtual address translation in user-state, context synchronizing).
And, the L=1 case on Book-IIIS is more like the L=0 case in Book-IIIE.
Also, I do not (yet) see the actual implementation of the Book-IIIS L=0 behavior
in the QEMU code. This bug is probably masked by the fact that folks who use
mtmsr probably know what they are doing -- i.e. who would try to enable user-mode
and not enabled address translation?
Egads, what a mess.
I agree with Alex that a flags based approach could be used to support the L bit for
Book III-S models and to ignore the L bit for Book III-E models. The question is
which flag(s) can we use? Let me see if I can find out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-28 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-28 8:16 [Qemu-devel] target-ppc: Problem with mtmsr emulation Thomas Huth
2014-03-28 10:25 ` Alexander Graf
2014-03-28 12:02 ` Thomas Huth
2014-03-28 14:36 ` Tom Musta [this message]
2014-03-28 17:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Tom Musta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533588FC.70807@gmail.com \
--to=tommusta@gmail.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).