From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVNYv-0006kJ-Ny for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:58:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVNYp-0006Ai-GI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:58:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29623) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVNYp-0006Ad-89 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 11:58:43 -0400 Message-ID: <533C33AC.3050502@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:58:36 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1396283195-6819-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <5339E521.40906@suse.de> <20140402155554.GA11987@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140402155554.GA11987@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0 0/7] SMBus and tmp105 fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4r?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ber?= Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 02/04/2014 17:55, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > I've reviewed these and they look sane and safe for 2.0. > > mst, could you have a second look as PC maintainer and take them? > > I'd rather delay to 2.1. > It's not a regression is it? No, I'm fine with 2.1 since I won't be around to fix mess. Paolo