From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55572) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYK8N-0005j2-Tm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:55:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYK8J-0000EH-3K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:55:35 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40870) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WYK8I-0000Bd-6W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:55:30 -0400 Message-ID: <5346E91F.4050406@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:55:27 -0400 From: Cole Robinson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Should we have a 2.0-rc3 ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell , QEMU Developers , Gerd Hoffmann On 04/10/2014 07:17 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > So far I know of at least three fixes which should probably > go into 2.0: > * my fix for the configure stack-protector checks on MacOSX > * MST's pull request updating the ACPI test blobs > * MST says we need to update the hex files for ACPI too > (otherwise you get a different ACPI blob depending on whether > your build system had iasl or not, if I understand correctly) > > Are there any others? > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg00217.html Relative mode with sdl2.c is completely busted. Patch 1 is safe and makes the mouse actually move, but with the cruddy 'invisible wall' behavior. Patch 2 fixes that, but I haven't tested it enough to know if there are side effects. Gerd, can you take a look at patch #1 and consider sending a 2.0 pull request? Thanks, Cole