From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Whesb-0004jn-MX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:53:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WhesV-0001gP-ND for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2014 08:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: <5368DB5A.4010703@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 07:53:46 -0500 From: Tom Musta MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1394720011-2482-1-git-send-email-tommusta@gmail.com> <534817B8.8060501@suse.de> <534820F0.2040104@twiddle.net> <34BA7020-1AA7-489B-803A-50AE67352AEF@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <34BA7020-1AA7-489B-803A-50AE67352AEF@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [V2 PATCH 0/6] Refactor AES Instructions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , Richard Henderson Cc: "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 4/11/2014 5:53 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > > >> Am 11.04.2014 um 19:05 schrieb Richard Henderson : >> >> On 04/11/2014 09:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> >>>> V2: updated patch 05/06 per Richard Henderson's review (const pointer to const) >>> >>> Looks good to me. Which queue should this go through? IMHO Richard would be the >>> perfect person to get this through one of his. >> >> I'm happy with it going through ppc-next. >> It's minimal changes to i386 and arm, honestly. >> >> Plus it's less work for me. ;-) > > Then I need your Ack or Reviewed-by tags :) > > Alex > >> >> >> r~ Ping. Is there actually anything more you need, Alex? Richard did review.