From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/11] hw: use ld_p/st_p instead of ld_raw/st_raw
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 21:03:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <536D2667.2080503@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_4AVu85orL6M0cAjuvvD0MzRHAsfVe2_q+a9ER=44U0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Il 09/05/2014 20:18, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> The virtio parts of this look dubious. What actual
> endianness does the virtio spec say that things like the
> block device geometry should have in memory? I suspect
> we should be using the use-the-virtio-endianness accessors
> Greg's on-list patches implement, which renders the
> raw-vs-p question moot. In any case you'll probably
> have patch conflicts there.
It's "target" endianness. Yes, there would be conflicts.
> For nseries.c I think I'd prefer we do the checkpatch fixups.
> There's no reason we can't do this now (ie we don't wait
> on the fixes which make the rest of this series an RFC),
Ok.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-09 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-08 16:09 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Cleanup load/store functions in headers and C files Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/11] hw: use ld_p/st_p instead of ld_raw/st_raw Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-09 18:18 ` Peter Maydell
2014-05-09 19:03 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/11] softmmu: start introducing SOFTMMU_CODE_ACCESS in softmmu_header.h Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/11] softmmu: move MMUSUFFIX under SOFTMMU_CODE_ACCESS Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/11] softmmu: move definition of CPU_MMU_INDEX to inclusion site, drop ACCESS_TYPE Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/11] softmmu: move ALIGNED_ONLY to cpu.h Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/11] softmmu: commonize helper definitions Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/11] softmmu: move softmmu_template.h out of include/ Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/11] softmmu: make do_unaligned_access extern Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-13 6:53 ` Andreas Färber
2014-05-13 7:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/11] target-arm: move arm_*_code to a separate file Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-13 7:03 ` Andreas Färber
2014-05-13 9:05 ` Peter Maydell
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/11] softmmu: introduce cpu_ldst.h Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-08 16:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] softmmu: move all load/store functions to cpu_ldst.h Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 17:36 ` Richard Henderson
2014-05-13 7:13 ` Andreas Färber
2014-05-13 7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-05-12 17:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] Cleanup load/store functions in headers and C files Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=536D2667.2080503@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).