From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39985)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WjxiJ-0004O4-HQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 17:24:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WjxiE-0000ZB-MA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 17:24:47 -0400
Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]:41857)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rth7680@gmail.com>) id 1WjxiE-0000Z1-HB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 17:24:42 -0400
Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q108so8247934qgd.41
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 12 May 2014 14:24:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Richard Henderson <rth7680@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53713C16.4010303@twiddle.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:24:38 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <40331399383189@web21g.yandex.ru>
	<CAFEAcA8dtgtUyWZzjxWMq7PSsDQfPWTZ+VDiOphf0m4dk+5_fw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8dtgtUyWZzjxWMq7PSsDQfPWTZ+VDiOphf0m4dk+5_fw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: fix handling of ZF in btx
	instructions
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Dmitry Poletaev <poletaev-qemu@yandex.ru>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 05/07/2014 02:03 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 May 2014 14:33, Dmitry Poletaev <poletaev-qemu@yandex.ru> wrote:
>> Eflags for bt/bts/btr/btc instructions compute as for shift(SAR) instructions. According to Intel A2 manual, for btx instructions zf is unaffected under any condition, but for SAR group, when evaluate eflags, we compute zf.
> 
> Isn't this the same bug that's fixed by Richard Henderson's
> patch from last month?
> 
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/337929/

Yes, thanks for the reminder.  Sending pull now.


r~