From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wkdyb-0002wZ-ET for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:32:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkdyW-00063Q-GM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:32:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16660) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WkdyW-00063K-8V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:32:20 -0400 Message-ID: <5373B6B1.1020906@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 12:32:17 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="N8CbHfij6Ion4ocGWh0vnLLl9JRUH3R4A" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] vnc or spice which one is better List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Kekane, Abhishek" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --N8CbHfij6Ion4ocGWh0vnLLl9JRUH3R4A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/14/2014 12:17 PM, Kekane, Abhishek wrote: > Hi All, >=20 > Just wondering which graphics device is better between vnc and spice in= terms of features and performance and why? I'm hoping others can chime in with better details; but from my perspective, spice allows copy-and-paste between host and guest, and support for audio alongside video, while vnc does not. Spice also has better encryption, a notion of separation of channels (where you can choose which pieces are sent encrypted), and was designed from the ground up to minimize bandwidth as well as to reduce work when nothing is on the other end of the connection. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --N8CbHfij6Ion4ocGWh0vnLLl9JRUH3R4A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTc7axAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq6g4H/3Ec9Jqeqm0R5dVdYqK7PZLT MGAv95drmSfBtgdeqOJApMyLwZN8JfrqeKXNfzM3gcsoxqNcQurtl5FjBVpQrHFP YirfDeVVxeavgStAebMs9348iqi9/vQawU1ILCoNc4uHoUg46lMzMkY1YYXUya6x o/Vd/fwAkCSc41r/oCkOJsao8lGZZKdsuPy7FMCRALGSO6q13jsVMUsJYtjeBP/v LPhNOKdKts/s8yBopOWNlNEPCmZM9g/rsocTM26E3o3cPzlr9sB9WUDHW67/2r9G WkZg0CVXfrJUXD+edCSKjAcY2nQW0nIqQOBGCpxipf2aMlk6Iy8fTFcw3ATmoLE= =ShfP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --N8CbHfij6Ion4ocGWh0vnLLl9JRUH3R4A--