From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45899) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wkz8f-0007Aa-Je for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:08:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wkz8Z-00066w-9r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:08:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20921) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wkz8Z-00066q-1N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 May 2014 13:08:07 -0400 Message-ID: <5374F471.7010402@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 19:08:01 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1399985844-788-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <5374F156.9020608@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5374F156.9020608@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/15] KVM patches for 2014-05-13 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Maydell Il 15/05/2014 18:54, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: > You forgot to fill in my Rbs, and somehow the Cc:s were not processed t= o > detect this earlier. > > Also to me a generic cpu_soft_reset() contradicts Peter confirming that > doing this in a specific qemu_irq based way is desired? Yes, I will implement qemu_irq. > If the PC is > going to implement the qemu_irq triggered logic, then CPU_FOREACH() can > be done in PC code, and no generalization of interrupt names is needed. > Or do you have any non-x86 work cooking as well? The patches do not include the generic CPU_FOREACH. I didn't get any=20 answer (positive or negative) when I said I'd keep patches 1-7, so I=20 included the rename in the pull request. Paolo