From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wmgg0-0007U6-67 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:49:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wmgfu-00048M-8v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:49:40 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60141 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wmgfu-00047x-2e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 05:49:34 -0400 Message-ID: <537B2529.9020608@suse.de> Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 11:49:29 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v5 0/2] Named GPIOs List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Crosthwaite , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, edgari@xilinx.com, alistai@xilinx.com Am 20.05.2014 08:30, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite: > This series implements Named GPIOs on the qdev level. Patch 1 is the > feature presentation. >=20 > Second patch I give a useful example of the feature's use (an SSI > cleanup). >=20 > This kinda falls through the cracks between the active maintainerships. > In v4 review, Peter suggested QOM queue, can this go via? Thanks for fixing it up yourself. Applied to qom-next: https://github.com/afaerber/qemu-cpu/commits/qom-next Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg