From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59026) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn1Nd-0008HF-EK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 03:56:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn1NY-0005JV-DG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 03:56:05 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51051 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wn1NY-0005J7-6i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 21 May 2014 03:56:00 -0400 Message-ID: <537C5C0E.80400@suse.de> Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 09:55:58 +0200 From: Alexander Graf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <537C2358.3080201@ozlabs.ru> <537C5AE5.3080300@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <537C5AE5.3080300@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] fpu/softfloat.c licensing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Alexey Kardashevskiy , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Cc: Tom Musta , Michael Ranweiler , Paul Mackerras On 21.05.14 09:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 21/05/2014 05:54, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> Hi! >> >> We recently discovered that not entire QEMU is GPL2-compatible, the fpu >> emulation has a different license (copied below) which might create >> legal >> problems because of that "INDEMNIFY" statement. >> >> Does anyone else care (except IBM)? >> >> What would the proper solution be? Ask the creator to relicense it under >> GPL? I failed to find a contact as the homepage on berkeley.edu is >> restricted. Rewrite the code? This code is used in FPU emulation for >> TCG, >> is that the only use of it? If it should not get called for KVM, that >> would >> be a temporary band-aid for us :) > > http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=136725946312880&w=4 > > The following people haven't acked the relicensing of their > contributions from softfloat-2b to softfloat-2a or GPLv2+ yet: > > Fabrice Bellard > 1d6bda356153c82e100680d9f2165e32c8fb1330 > 750afe93fd15fafc20b6c34d30f339547d15c2d1 > > Jocelyn Mayer > 75d62a585629cdc1ae0d530189653cb1d8d9c53c > > Thiemo Seufer's parents (Stefan said he'd contact them) > 5a6932d51d1b34b68b3f10fc5ac65598bece88c0 > 924b2c07cdfaba9ac408fc5fa77da75a570f9dc5 > b645bb48850fea8db017026897827f0ab42fbdea > fc81ba536bc3d8cdbcf9e92369e9bc5ede69da10 > > This list only includes people whose contributions has not been > reverted in the meanwhile. How many % of the overall commits does that make? IIRC you can relicense source code if the "majority of authors" agrees and nobody actively disagrees - or so. But IANAL :) Alex