From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48768)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1WnrAc-0000JZ-8p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 11:14:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1WnrAT-0001mr-8H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 11:14:06 -0400
Received: from mail-ee0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c00::232]:33857)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1WnrAT-0001mi-1M
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 May 2014 11:13:57 -0400
Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e51so3781255eek.37
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 23 May 2014 08:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <537F65B0.1020609@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 17:13:52 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1400845497-29618-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<1400845497-29618-2-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<20140523150317.GA3058@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140523150317.GA3058@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] glib-compat.h: add new thread API
 emulation on top of pre-2.31 API
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mjt@mls.msk.ru

Il 23/05/2014 17:03, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:44:54PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> +static inline gpointer do_g_cond_new(gpointer unused)
>> +{
>> +    return (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) (gpointer) g_cond_new();
>
> what what what what what what what what what what what?

I guess I fat-fingered an "i" into "9i"...

Is this the only complaint? :)

Paolo