* Re: [Qemu-devel] When should management tools use q35?
[not found] <538A806D.7010300@redhat.com>
@ 2014-06-01 18:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2014-06-01 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cole Robinson, qemu-devel; +Cc: Gerd Hoffmann, Laine Stump
Il 01/06/2014 03:22, Cole Robinson ha scritto:
> Hi all,
>
> There was a bit of discussion recently about exposing q35 in virt-manager:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/virt-tools-list/2014-May/msg00001.html
>
> In that thread, Gerd suggested a 'rule of thumb' to use q35 for any guest OS
> released in 2010 or later. Sounds reasonable to me, but I'm curious if anyone
> else wants to weigh in.
>
> Is q35 in 'good enough' shape to turn on a default like that? Does it still
> block migration? (pretty sure that was fixed, but I haven't confirmed)
AHCI migration still does not work reliably. I think that we could
change it to block migration only if you have IDE drives, but still
means that exposing q35 in virt-manager might be problematic.
Paolo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2014-06-01 18:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <538A806D.7010300@redhat.com>
2014-06-01 18:14 ` [Qemu-devel] When should management tools use q35? Paolo Bonzini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).