From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrTn5-0004aP-26 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:04:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrTmy-0002qL-N1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:04:47 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrTmy-0002q9-Bs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:04:40 -0400 Message-ID: <538C9285.5010804@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 09:04:37 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1401537111-10221-1-git-send-email-benoit.canet@irqsave.net> <1401537111-10221-39-git-send-email-benoit.canet@irqsave.net> In-Reply-To: <1401537111-10221-39-git-send-email-benoit.canet@irqsave.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eWbvgrRuUstwG2w35kjAokqsexDl73PWr" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 38/72] qapi: Extract block-stream definition into qapi/block-core.json List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QmVub8OudCBDYW5ldA==?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Jeff Cody , Benoit Canet , stefanha@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eWbvgrRuUstwG2w35kjAokqsexDl73PWr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/31/2014 05:51 AM, Beno=C3=AEt Canet wrote: > Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet > --- > qapi-schema.json | 38 -------------------------------------- > qapi/block-core.json | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) 21-38: Reviewed-by: Eric Blake I will point out that all this refactoring work will have conflicts with other pending patches in the same area, such as Jeff's work on using node-name in block-stream; but such conflicts should be obvious resolutions (either series can go first, as long as the final result is the improved command ending up in the new file). I don't know which series going in first would be more of a conflict magnet to the other series. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --eWbvgrRuUstwG2w35kjAokqsexDl73PWr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTjJKFAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqFC8H/1DcALTyYemPqu+lZir0Rx/8 HiDXPlwozWpIIfIY2QxDEz2yyu9I7PcC0+z5DylUICz/7YVn5fdB7MTkKLXe/7Qf Zbp04fGXd9K8r5MOv4jyw1r8bEeh+g5jJxybvGwXOpt2vqh/JUwi9FiBq0JT6imR slCwKHyEAo4nO6aAF8IkhL4VJHWBUdM6VnCsO6I29DnSaTwydkdrZBfuiNum4f/x 619T1IZK60WpK8Yq07yZ2r2DnQ1q+vFqqSPtL3RwL481MrHvcq58PnfGDGeY5P8t YB272RGeOBklJccahTspy7/n5ck1pJ+m329a9KhQNH+TCmtLu/Ph/+cvUUhkKWQ= =QP8r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eWbvgrRuUstwG2w35kjAokqsexDl73PWr--