From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54658) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrY6n-00079i-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:41:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrY6h-0004zV-3p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:41:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrY6g-0004zP-QV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 15:41:19 -0400 Message-ID: <538CD35A.5010506@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:41:14 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20140602175104.579823673@amt.cnet> <538CCB0E.8050909@redhat.com> <20140602192015.GA9999@amt.cnet> In-Reply-To: <20140602192015.GA9999@amt.cnet> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eI1okFAHNiNVQk507T1dEJaRAspwKadNS" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 0/3] add QMP command to reset rtc interrupt backlog (v3) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: gleb@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, mprivozn@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eI1okFAHNiNVQk507T1dEJaRAspwKadNS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/02/2014 01:20 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 01:05:50PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 06/02/2014 11:51 AM, mtosatti@redhat.com wrote: >>> It is necessary to reset RTC interrupt backlog if guest time is >>> synchronized via a different mechanism, such as QGA's guest-set-time >>> command. >>> >>> Failing to do so causes both corrections to be applied (summed), >>> resulting in an incorrect guest time. >> >> Please send v3 of a series as a new top-level thread instead of buried= >> as a reply to v2. >=20 > I prefer to delete whole threads i am not interested in. >=20 > What is the problem with threads for you ? Threads are good. But one thread per version of a series is better than one thread for ALL versions of the series, as documented in our patch submission guidelines: http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch Since most of contributors are already doing that, most reviewers have gotten into the habit of assuming that any replies to a series are in regards to things to fix, rather than looking for a new version of the series. I'd rather kill several threads for versions of a series, then later learn that a new revision of the series needs my review; than kill a single thread, at which point I no longer see any new versions in my inbox but also lose any chance to be easily pulled back in to that topic.= --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --eI1okFAHNiNVQk507T1dEJaRAspwKadNS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTjNNaAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqjHcH/1W5VjvQxE7oyftxJHsump5i MjhfxFxXsxVGishE4KOI9exZ3VK/cgeXS1uTyxdN97jQdj82PlJReEWBtoy8A1z0 Mcf6iiBp2JzH4vd4NxjIfzatOdPB4nxnobK0MUo18p7iugfW433H4u8GlqeYu4Q1 ukRW/J0WlHHu/StL1h1IZeRCuMT6UJz2MC6z7frAM0DrYI+kiEZtjMqYB/3ZM/2R uKZJ+eVy7hR0EXnLEzlTX9b4FT4upqno44tBkQ6PJC5/Bbpjs1dUzSqT2a407ndv QP0iAFIhDFVcuQ1ePFYekFvJuqqiJ6vsOxoSvq18wn1aEBPiD5/bCno3jU4/pa0= =bMbT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eI1okFAHNiNVQk507T1dEJaRAspwKadNS--