From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrYUn-0007RR-Qu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:06:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrYUc-0004oo-NA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:06:13 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:59573) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrYUc-0004oJ-Gi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 16:06:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l18so5728735wgh.35 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 13:06:01 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <538CD925.4060301@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 22:05:57 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1401276034-30486-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <5385CC10.6030909@redhat.com> <20140528120444.GE2372@work-vm> <871tv7bhyn.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20140602135004.GF2634@work-vm> <538C9D74.3020204@redhat.com> <20140602164032.GG2634@work-vm> <538CB6DF.3050907@redhat.com> <20140602174411.GH2634@work-vm> In-Reply-To: <20140602174411.GH2634@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Migrate with destination version List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: Markus Armbruster , quintela@redhat.com, Laszlo Ersek , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com Il 02/06/2014 19:44, Dr. David Alan Gilbert ha scritto: >> > If the version-based interface turns out to be not enough, we've done the >> > work for nothing. In fact, we already know that it is not enough to solve >> > 2.0->1.6 migration with -M pc-1.5. > Remind me, why doesn't it solve that? > (It would be a pain to implement but if this is just the pci host format > I believe it would be doable) Sorry, it does solve 2.0->1.6 but it would not solve 1.6->2.0. Paolo