From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42645) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrrgQ-0005B8-K9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:35:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrrgK-000697-KG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 12:35:30 -0400 Message-ID: <538DF948.2080903@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:35:20 -0500 From: Tom Musta MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1401787684-31895-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> <1401787684-31895-6-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> In-Reply-To: <1401787684-31895-6-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 05/29] target-ppc: Add "POWER" prefix to MMCRA PMU registers List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf On 6/3/2014 4:27 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > Since we started adding "POWER" prefix to 64bit PMU SPRs, let's finish > the transition and fix MMCRA and define a hypv version of it. > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy I'm still not a fan of "SPR_POWER_*" since these are now in the ISA (the "_POWER_" seems redundant). Aside from that ... Reviewed-by: Tom Musta