From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33541)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Wsazr-0002Du-Uc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:58:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Wsazk-0007ea-Bk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:58:35 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58623)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Wsazk-0007eO-3W
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:58:28 -0400
Message-ID: <5390A195.4000003@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 18:57:57 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1401984741-26882-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<539099B6.2090000@suse.de> <53909A41.1060800@redhat.com>
	<53909D79.1070609@suse.de> <53909E53.9050300@redhat.com>
	<53909E9C.6080009@suse.de> <5390A06A.9070200@redhat.com>
	<5390A0B6.8050000@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <5390A0B6.8050000@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/2] GET_EMULATED_CPUID support with
	"allow-emulation" option
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, "Gabriel L. Somlo" <gsomlo@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>

Il 05/06/2014 18:54, Alexander Graf ha scritto:
>>
>> What about:
>>
>> - letting "-cpu foo,+emulatedfeature" just work
>>
>> - adding emulated=yes that blindly enables all emulated features
>>
>> - making "-cpu ...,check" prints a warning for emulated features
>> unless emulated=yes
>
> How about we remove the emulated=yes from this list? Then I'm happy :).

So:

- "-cpu foo" doesn't enable any emulated feature

- "-cpu foo,+movbe" does

- "-cpu foo,check" and "-cpu foo,enforce" print a nice and descriptive 
message if the feature is not available but could be enabled as emulated

Ok?

Paolo