From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41170)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WudPV-0003XE-U3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:57:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1WudPP-000859-Pj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 03:57:29 -0400
Message-ID: <53980BD1.5010001@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:57:05 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1401869330-32449-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>	<1401869330-32449-2-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>	<20140610093951.6dd64ea4@redhat.com>
	<20140610164107.249d8290.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
	<5397FC3B.8010203@ozlabs.ru>
In-Reply-To: <5397FC3B.8010203@ozlabs.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/4] cpus: Define NMI callback
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

Il 11/06/2014 08:50, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> And I changed x86 to inject NMI on the default CPU only (used to be on all
> CPUs), and I wonder again if it is actually ok and won't break things.
>

For x86 it is better to send it to one CPU only.

Paolo