From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v1 1/1] qom: object: remove parent pointer when unparenting
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:28:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53983D4B.10304@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEgOgz7p7XPJGHSboAff-XUBDtimRR=fay12U4Ctdrp9B2t+tg@mail.gmail.com>
Am 11.06.2014 12:19, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 27.05.2014 02:39, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
>>> Certain parts of the QOM framework test this pointer to determine if
>>> an object is parented. Nuke it when the object is unparented to allow
>>> for reuse of an object after unparenting.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> qom/object.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
>>> index e42b254..8319e89 100644
>>> --- a/qom/object.c
>>> +++ b/qom/object.c
>>> @@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ void object_unparent(Object *obj)
>>> if (obj->parent) {
>>> object_property_del_child(obj->parent, obj, NULL);
>>> }
>>> + obj->parent = NULL;
>>> object_unref(obj);
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> This looks okay to me, and it might also help the segfault on hot-unplug
>> Stefan and Kevin reported before I went on travels.
>>
>
> Welcome back.
>
>> Any objection to moving this one line up into the if?
>>
>
> No problem. Will respin.
I've done so myself, but now I wonder why we are checking obj->parent at
all there after we already return if !obj->parent? Is this to guard
against ObjectClass::unparent() changing Object::parent? Either way, the
two variants you posted and I suggested should be fine.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <97a5753d0e2e5d8ce43730fb0d8595ceb69261a9.1401151094.git.peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
2014-06-02 0:35 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom v1 1/1] qom: object: remove parent pointer when unparenting Peter Crosthwaite
2014-06-04 8:21 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2014-06-11 8:13 ` Andreas Färber
2014-06-11 10:19 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2014-06-11 11:28 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2014-06-11 11:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-06-11 11:52 ` Peter Crosthwaite
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53983D4B.10304@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).