From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51248)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WwUw9-0005cB-Ad
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:18:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WwUw4-0007jo-Ks
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:18:53 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36384 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1WwUw4-0007jj-EM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 07:18:48 -0400
Message-ID: <539ED297.8050308@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:18:47 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a00d788d723bada207cc99e3e74a1deec80455f1.1402363608.git.alistair.francis@xilinx.com>
	<CAEgOgz4N5myT410sNF9hCHZDW0AxM-r4ynkxq+78cO3d19C5HQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<539EC4B1.5090709@suse.de>
	<CAFEAcA_M6N5tBm3fPsAz0uC=NHP9Z-7VoxkyNgcP9dvZne=v0Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_M6N5tBm3fPsAz0uC=NHP9Z-7VoxkyNgcP9dvZne=v0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v1 1/2] arm: Add the cortex-a9 CPU to the
 a9mpcore device
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xilinx.com>

Am 16.06.2014 12:44, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 16 June 2014 11:19, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
>> Am 16.06.2014 06:43, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
>>> So you could add an integer property listener to init them earlier (o=
r
>>> even do dynamic extending/freeing or the allocated CPUs). I'm not sur=
e
>>> exactly what we are really supposed to do though, when the number of
>>> child object depends on a prop like this? Andreas?
>>
>> PMM had added or looked into a property creating an array of propertie=
s.
>> However a more fundamental issue that PMM was unsure about is whether
>> the CPUs should be child<> of MPCore as done here or a sibling of the
>> MPCore container.
>=20
> Was I? I can't currently see any reason you'd want them to be
> siblings of the container rather than children...
>=20
> I think property-listeners was the mechanism we talked
> about for when you need to do something before realize
> but it depends on some property, yes.

Got a pointer to that? Waiting for review or merged in my absence?

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg