From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwZQ2-0006nN-Ft for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:06:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwZPx-0004O2-HV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:06:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:9200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WwZPw-0004Nw-PQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:05:57 -0400 Message-ID: <539F15E0.9080604@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 10:05:52 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6c190c63ca7fe6a1d6d5d0944b23240018d76310.1402299637.git.hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> <20140616140817.GA8629@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <539EFC39.4030701@redhat.com> <539EFDDD.6010407@redhat.com> <539EFFE9.10608@redhat.com> <20140616153955.GC3222@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <539F1147.1000409@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <539F1147.1000409@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Hd5k2I3vURRQFdiJXHFIRSEqWHtDoXpe7" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] [PATCH v4 04/29] NUMA: convert -numa option to use OptsVisitor List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , Eduardo Habkost Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , libvir-list@redhat.com, Hu Tao , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Martin Kletzander , Igor Mammedov This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Hd5k2I3vURRQFdiJXHFIRSEqWHtDoXpe7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/16/2014 09:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 16/06/2014 17:39, Eduardo Habkost ha scritto: >> > No, this is a (backwards-compatible) extension to how the option is >> parsed. >> >> But numa started appearing on query-command-line-options only after th= is >> patch got applied. It is not the semantics I would expect from >> query-command-line-options, but it is a hint that we have a QEMU versi= on >> with the new numa option handling code. >=20 > Oh, then indeed it's possible. I had forgotten that -numa was using ad= > hoc parsing code, not QemuOpts. Then we have our witness, even without waiting for introspection :) >=20 >>> > I suppose with QAPI introspection you could check if the QAPI type >>> for -numa >>> > is defined... >> Does this exist, or is it just an idea? >=20 > Amos was working on it. Although given that soft freeze is tomorrow, it looks very unlikely that we'll have it in 2.1. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --Hd5k2I3vURRQFdiJXHFIRSEqWHtDoXpe7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTnxXgAAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq9F4H+QGUnBl2E6VmNt3Yx4vQN9xW nvsdBlVYIjDHWFSZXsKNSCuKvh1umQPpvuiwEsXGAHpjrAOsTVVcrxZQ9pm/A8mY i746/d4IpouQouqMfZCZfAIbsDF5FLnev/bo2DjmsiYRdaKrmAM9IqGK9zwng2Ov RTAEyJPRunWVtGlhUV4+IBm51zNIS088vHHvEmvrUwBcV9NEO3k2nNJ6ta1rTBhQ aIfV8WcEFc4DYI6plYrBGipQpCaVRuSqqlBJLKl8ttGaUOTtVpI9TQqPrD8oivGH 3zQ72nlWY64uD8S17ZmnSFiQ33yGqMpfzRRnS2sSoICFrwyCxG1t/uvqV/Addio= =dxxr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Hd5k2I3vURRQFdiJXHFIRSEqWHtDoXpe7--