From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50795) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wwktu-0000Yv-8a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:21:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wwktl-0002Rl-7f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:21:38 -0400 Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <539FC243.2070906@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:21:23 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6DBD3DBB-24B1-4564-B524-E8E73508BBC5@jnielsen.net> <42870B81-CA29-4161-9BCE-F6D6020C3D2C@jnielsen.net> <539F1DC0.4020604@redhat.com> <4F14D859-D641-4AB5-B749-83D9D82F1DEA@jnielsen.net> In-Reply-To: <4F14D859-D641-4AB5-B749-83D9D82F1DEA@jnielsen.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Hang on reboot in FreeBSD guest on Linux KVM host List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Nielsen Cc: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" Il 16/06/2014 18:47, John Nielsen ha scritto: > On Jun 16, 2014, at 10:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Il 16/06/2014 18:09, John Nielsen ha scritto: >>>>> The only substantial difference on the hardware side is the CPU. >>>>> The hosts where the problem occurs use "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU >>>>> E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz", while the hosts that don't show the >>>>> problem use the prior revision, "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ >>>>> 2.00GHz". >> >> Can you do "grep . /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/*" on both hosts please? > > No differences that I can see. Output below. Not really: > Working host: > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz > # grep . /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/* > /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_apicv:N > > Problem host: > Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz > # grep . /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/* > /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_apicv:Y So we have a clue. Let me study the code more, I'll try to get back with a suggestion. In the meanwhile, I'm CCing the KVM list and BCCing QEMU, so that follow-ups come to the KVM list. Paolo