From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52001) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wwl3C-0002tI-Er for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:31:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wwl36-0005OC-Pj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:31:14 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:47501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wwl36-0005O8-J6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 00:31:08 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so6653306wes.13 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <539FC485.7070305@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 06:31:01 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1402939751-8371-1-git-send-email-somlo@cmu.edu> <539F7126.6070205@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <539F7126.6070205@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 0/3] e1000: link auto-negotiation fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf , "Gabriel L. Somlo" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: romain@dolbeau.org, afaerber@suse.de, stefanha@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com Il 17/06/2014 00:35, Alexander Graf ha scritto: > > On 16.06.14 19:29, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote: >> This series contains a few fixes and improvements in the emulation >> of link auto-negotiation: >> >> - use auto-negotiation when the link is bounced externally (e.g. via >> set_link down/up on the qemu monitor command line). >> >> - allow mii_tool on linux access to all the phy registers and flags >> it requires in order to report a successfully auto-negotiated link. >> >> - inject LSC interrupt upon successful link auto-negotiation (required >> by stock OS X e1000 driver). >> >> See additional prose following commit logs in 2/3 (making up excuses >> for checkpatch error) and 3/3 (further thoughts on OS X vs. Linux/Windows >> re. auto-negotiation and LSC injection). > > Looks very reasonable and straight forward to me. > > Reviewed-by: Alexander Graf Would you pick it up and send a pull request for it? Paolo