From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58533) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WxHIf-00009D-PK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:57:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WxHIX-0005Nk-6O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:57:21 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]:60120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WxHIX-0005NW-0I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:57:13 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so1011488wes.13 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 07:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53A1A8BE.3000801@6wind.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:57:02 +0200 From: David Marchand MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87vbs6qjhj.fsf_-_@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <5399CF09.8030803@6wind.com> <87ppidnqmy.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <539AC3E0.9090404@6wind.com> <539ACDE6.7020709@redhat.com> <539AFF7C.7090702@6wind.com> <539B064D.2050501@redhat.com> <53A00464.8090609@6wind.com> <53A00DEB.8030400@redhat.com> <20140618104849.GH14030@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20140618104849.GH14030@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Henning Schild , Olivier MATZ , kvm , qemu-devel , Linux Virtualization , Vincent JARDIN , "thomas.monjalon@6wind.com" Hello Stefan, On 06/18/2014 12:48 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > One more thing to add to the list: > > static void ivshmem_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t * buf, int flags) > > The "flags" argument should be "size". Size should be checked before > accessing buf. You are welcome to send a fix and I will review it. > > Please also see the bug fixes in the following unapplied patch: > "[PATCH] ivshmem: fix potential OOB r/w access (#2)" by Sebastian Krahmer > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg03538.html Thanks for the pointer. I'll check it. -- David Marchand