From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] coroutine-win32.c: Add noinline attribute to work around gcc bug
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:02:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53A84184.6090000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403535303-14939-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Il 23/06/2014 16:55, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
> A gcc codegen bug in x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc (GCC) 4.6.3 means that
> non-debug builds of QEMU for Windows tend to assert when using
> coroutines. Work around this by marking qemu_coroutine_switch
> as noinline.
>
> If we allow gcc to inline qemu_coroutine_switch into
> coroutine_trampoline, then it hoists the code to get the
> address of the TLS variable "current" out of the while() loop.
> This is an invalid transformation because the SwitchToFiber()
> call may be called when running thread A but return in thread B,
> and so we might be in a different thread context each time
> round the loop. This can happen quite often. Typically.
> a coroutine is started when a VCPU thread does bdrv_aio_readv:
>
> VCPU thread
>
> main VCPU thread coroutine I/O coroutine
> bdrv_aio_readv ----->
> start I/O operation
> thread_pool_submit_co
> <------------ yields
> back to emulation
>
> Then I/O finishes and the thread-pool.c event notifier triggers in
> the I/O thread. event_notifier_ready calls thread_pool_co_cb, and
> the I/O coroutine now restarts *in another thread*:
>
> iothread
>
> main iothread coroutine I/O coroutine (formerly in VCPU thread)
> event_notifier_ready
> thread_pool_co_cb -----> current = I/O coroutine;
> call AIO callback
>
> But on Win32, because of the bug, the "current" being set here the
> current coroutine of the VCPU thread, not the iothread.
>
> noinline is a good-enough workaround, and quite unlikely to break in
> the future.
>
> (Thanks to Paolo Bonzini for assistance in diagnosing the problem
> and providing the detailed example/ascii art quoted above.)
My only comments are that:
* I would apply the workaround on all backends, just to be safe. I
guess the block maintainers can do that.
* You should Cc qemu-stable@nongnu.org
* You are downplaying your insight that inlining was the real trigger of
the bug. :)
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> coroutine-win32.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/coroutine-win32.c b/coroutine-win32.c
> index edc1f72..17ace37 100644
> --- a/coroutine-win32.c
> +++ b/coroutine-win32.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,17 @@ typedef struct
> static __thread CoroutineWin32 leader;
> static __thread Coroutine *current;
>
> -CoroutineAction qemu_coroutine_switch(Coroutine *from_, Coroutine *to_,
> - CoroutineAction action)
> +/* This function is marked noinline to prevent GCC from inlining it
> + * into coroutine_trampoline(). If we allow it to do that then it
> + * hoists the code to get the address of the TLS variable "current"
> + * out of the while() loop. This is an invalid transformation because
> + * the SwitchToFiber() call may be called when running thread A but
> + * return in thread B, and so we might be in a different thread
> + * context each time round the loop.
> + */
> +CoroutineAction __attribute__((noinline))
> +qemu_coroutine_switch(Coroutine *from_, Coroutine *to_,
> + CoroutineAction action)
> {
> CoroutineWin32 *from = DO_UPCAST(CoroutineWin32, base, from_);
> CoroutineWin32 *to = DO_UPCAST(CoroutineWin32, base, to_);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-23 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-23 14:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] coroutine-win32.c: Add noinline attribute to work around gcc bug Peter Maydell
2014-06-23 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-06-23 15:55 ` Richard Henderson
2014-06-26 15:42 ` Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53A84184.6090000@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).